Monthly Archives: October 2019

Learning Without Tears

To play or not to play?  That seems to be the question plaguing teachers, administrators and early childhood curriculum specialists.  As a kindergarten and first grade teacher for over 15 years, I say PLAY!  Let them be little!  However, many of my colleagues will simply respond with one word- “When?!”  It is true that the kindergarten curriculum has become increasingly demanding over the last few decades.  Teachers feel the pressure of students needing to master rigorous state standards in order to prove themselves on mandated assessments.  Often this pressure forces teachers to “drill and kill.”  How heartbreaking for a five year old to sit through that?!  Developmentally it isn’t appropriate and even if the children are paying attention during these lessons they are not retaining or able to apply the information. 

We must have a mindset shift in this area.  Kindergarten students need to move, touch and manipulate- they learn through their five senses.  They need to learn to communicate and socialize.  They need to learn to love school and want to come each day!  If we can adapt to teaching in this way, we will create well-rounded little people.  So, how can we do this?  It will be hard to change our thinking.  We are creatures of habit.  However, we can start small and begin to simply keep play in mind when creating our lessons.  As we start to see opportunities to add playtime into our curriculum it will eventually become natural!  The following ideas are ways that can help you to start to develop a play mindset:   First, we must remember that the standards are what needs to be mastered and not necessarily how we need to teach.  Second, we need to understand that play doesn’t and shouldn’t have to be separate from mandated curriculum learning time.  Any curriculum can be made to be fun, joyful and even playful!  Third, we need to think about teaching through inquiry to help achieve a play mindset.  Children have a natural curiosity.  We can guide and facilitate observation, exploration and experimentation into our curriculum and that can lead to play!

The authors of the book, Purposeful Play: A Teacher’s Guide to Igniting Deep and Joyful Learning Across the Day stated it perfectly when they wrote “Play is just as needed to a child as food, health, and sleep.  Play is actually the work of children.”  As a teacher I have noticed that children have the endurance to play for a long period of time!  Yet, we struggle to help them build reading and writing stamina and then wonder why we can’t keep them engaged for more than three minutes.  The answer is simple: they are not ready.  They need to learn and be taught through a meaningful playtime!

Brown, S. L., & Vaughan, C. C. (2010). Play: how it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. New York: Avery.

Mraz, K., Porcelli, A., & Tyler, C. (2016). Purposeful play: a teachers guide to igniting deep and joyful learning across the day. Porstmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Combating Those Who Combat Gun Control.

An open letter to Education Commissioner Richard Corcoran

Dear Commissioner Corcoran,

In the interest of school safety, I ask that your offices look into streamlining standard operational procedures for the state mandating active shooter drills for schools in districts throughout the state. A standard approach would ensure a universally understood protocol that would allow all stakeholders to feel confident in any location during an emergency. Historically speaking, we have proven that emergency drills can be standardized. We have seen this done with tornado drills, earthquake drills, and fire drills. Why would we then not prepare ourselves for possible human-made emergencies as we would for natural disasters? 

Progress on gun violence prevention policy has been slow at the federal level. I believe that instead of focusing on the more extended target of legislative change, we should be focusing on creating guidelines provided by the state for individual districts to follow. There should be a standard statewide approach to enable schools across the state to manage active shooter threats. Students may stay in one region their entire academic career, or they may move within two, three, or four. The same goes for educators, administrators, and support personnel. I believe having a standardized approach created with the input of all stakeholders in the state of Florida could restore confidence to students and teachers alike. Confidence in knowing that no matter what happens, having the ability to help themselves and each other knowing what they should and should not do during one of these disasters.

At present, each school district in the state has taken its approach for developing and implementing district-wide school safety plans and emergency response procedures. They also go so far as to identify those individuals within the district responsible for those policies. The mission of the Florida Department of Education (FLDOE) is to establish a framework through which the department will prepare for, respond to, recover from, and mitigate the impact of significant emergencies that would adversely impact the health, safety, and general welfare of DOE employees (FLDOE, 2013). Emergency management seems to fall under the finance and operations structure of the department of education. The district safety and security best practices on the FLDOE website describe the methods along with their associated indicators. The forms presented are from the 2013-2014 school year, emphasizing protocols and procedures put into place, no doubt in response to the December 2012 Sandy Hook Massacre. Since that time, an estimated 269 cases of school shootings have been reported in America; that is an average of about one school shooting per week (Miller, 2016). These disasters hit very close to home with no warning, and school shootings have damaging long-term impacts on the school community as a whole. A recent analysis of school shootings found that those involving fatalities resulted in reduced student enrollment in the affected schools and negatively affected student performance. Recovery after these types of disasters has yet to be quantified since no one knows the long-time effects of how these tragedies will impact this generation of students.

I do believe that a statewide push for standardization of emergency preparedness within education for events such as active shooter threats provide overall uniformity. The result, improving strategies and performance in the event of an actual disaster. Overall, lessening the effects of gun violence in our schools and saving lives.

Florida Department of Education (FLDOE) Emergency Management. (2013). District Safety & Security Best Practices. Retrieved October 9, 2019, from http://fldoe.org/finance/emergency-management/dis-safety-security-best-practices.stml.

Miller, H. (2016). There Have Been Over 200 School Shooting Incidents Since Sandy Hook. Retrieved October 9, 2019, from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/school-shootings-since-sandy-hook_n_58503d99e4b04c8e2bb232eb.

Mass Shootings in America, 2009 to 2017. (2018). Retrieved October 9, 2019, from https://everytownresearch.org/reports/mass-shootings-analysis/.

Mental Abuse To Human, just say M.A.T.H.


Did someone say math?

Mathematics is one of the few words that will cause a person to instantly cringe no matter what their age or stage of life may be. As a teacher, I have heard several times that math is not a word but instead an acronym, Mental Abuse To Humans. This stress or “math anxiety” is described as a “feeling of tension, apprehension, or fear that interferes with math performance”. (Ashcraft, 2002) When this anxiety is not addressed in the beginning stage of learning math or if there is not a teacher that can show students that there is a way to solve problems without feeling like doomsday is the next question, the result is an adult that cannot complete a math-related task without an assistant. These individuals are more likely to rely on others to solve math-related problems but they are also at the mercy of those who have a strong grasp o the concept than they do.

If people are taught mathematics in a manner that is not stressful and unrelated to everyday life, I believe that they would be able to see the benefit in the content taught instead of the multiple strategies to find one solution to a seemingly irrelevant problem. (That is how most students feel while going through middle school and high school math courses.)

The first step to creating a less anxious anti-math person is to start with students while they are in elementary and middle school. In elementary, there are teachers that work to make the instruction of the subject colorful and vibrant by using manipulatives that even get adults excited (ie candy, puffballs, paints, games). As students transition into middle school, these fun colorful manipulatives are replaced by the mundane calculator and simple paper to pencil. If middle school mathematics kept some of the colorful manipulatives of elementary and coupled it with the instant real-world application there would be a shift in mindset.

How does changing a fraction to percent benefit me? Why is multiply or dividing fractions even important? Who cares if you can rotate a shape around an axis by 30 degrees and then slide it over there? Who needs to know how to convert numbers or measurements? When will I ever use the Pythagorean Theorem in my life?

The truth is I am not sure when the average person will ever use the Pythagorean Theorem again and I still am asking the same question but I digress.

Students, especially, in middle school need to learn how to utilize the concepts they are learning in math class for everyday life. Teaching students how to multiply and divide fractions using a cooking project will not only show them the importance of the topic but it will also give them the hands-on practice of manipulating a recipe. Showing students how to code and create video games using concepts that are learning during geometry will allow them to see that rotations, translations, and reflections are great concepts in math and not just when referring to clocks, languages or looking into a mirror. To create a curriculum for teachers to use that taught the same concepts/ standards but instantly related them all to everyday life skills would not only alleviate math anxiety but would prepare more students to be better citizens.

Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current directions in psychological science11(5), 181-185.

Could Your Child Save Your Life?

Consider this scenario: Its Christmas time and you’ve decided to put up Christmas lights around the front of your home. You are home with your six year old son and eight year old daughter. As you gather the lights and hanging materials, you realize you will need to use a ladder to securely fasten the lights to the trim and gutters surrounding the front of your home. As you get to the last section of lights to hang, the ladder wobbles and you fall to the ground…onto an exposed rock which causes you to lose consciousness and lacerate your head. Would your children know what to do to help potentially save your life?

When faced with a possible scenario like this, we would like to think that our children would know to call 9-1-1 and ask for help, but what if the injuries were more severe? What if, instead of a rock, you had fallen on a rake and suffered puncture wounds? Would a child know what to do then? Are children ages six and eight even able to comprehend what steps need to be taken in order to help save you? I would suggest that they are, and should be given the opportunity to learn certain life-saving skills.

In a January 2019 article published in the United Kingdom, it was shared that beginning in 2020, schools will require students to learn CPR, the purpose of defibrillators or AEDs, and basic treatments for common injuries. It was noted in the article that cardiac arrest survival rates in countries which taught CPR in school were double those of the United Kingdom. The hope of those who introduced this legislation was that if students learned these life-saving skills in school, they would feel more confident helping should an emergency situation occur in their proximity.

There will be those individuals who believe that children, as young as five or six years old, do not have the cognitive ability to learn sophisticated concepts such as first aid or CPR, and you would find many individuals who would support this idea. However, a study was conducted in 2014 where 315 students under the age of six years old were randomly selected to be placed into study groups. One group was trained in basic concepts of first aid, and the other group was not. The results of the study showed that very young children are able to learn and apply basic first aid skills taught to them by their teachers. Children are eager to learn, and eager to help those in need. You can see this anytime a ‘friend’ gets hurt on the playground or is sick at home. Their compassionate natures lend to their desire to help. Children are also very quick to learn new skills. Their brains are quickly able to assimilate new learning along with basic applications.

I hope that there is never a time when my son has to call 9-1-1 because I have been injured at home, but I feel better in the knowledge that should such an occasion arise, he knows how to call.

“Children to be taught lifesaving skills in school.” (Jan. 2019). Retrieved from https://www.aol.co.uk/news/2019/01/02/children-to-be-taught-lifesaving-skills-in-school/

Ammirati, Christine & Gagnayre, Rémi & Amsallem, Carole & Nemitz, B. & Gignon, Maxime. (2014). Are schoolteachers able to teach first aid to children younger than 6 years? A comparative study. BMJ open. 4. e005848. 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005848.

“Early Recruiting: Stop the Insanity”

An alarming trend is occurring and growing in the sports recruiting world that is stirring up mixed emotions amongst prospective student-athletes and coaches at both the high school and college level. More and more student-athletes are receiving verbal offers at alarmingly young ages. Currently, the NCAA Division I rules prohibit recruits from receiving phone calls from coaches, being invited on official visits, or receiving an offer until their junior or senior year in high school. Currently, a student-athlete is permitted to contact college coaches and take unofficial visits at the cost of the families and nothing being provided by the institutions. These visits are happening earlier and earlier. Student-athletes are being pressured to make verbal commitments as early as middle school. The effects of a young person committing verbally are felt by many others in the student-athlete’s circle.

According to New (2016), “Early recruiting is especially prevalent in sports like women’s soccer and lacrosse, where some players are being recruited as early as middle school” (Ivy League announces proposals for curbing early recruitment of athletes, para. 7). Athletes are facing big decisions that they are not physically, mentally, or emotionally ready to make. Many of these young athletes get caught up in the hype of feeling sought after which in many cases inflates their egos and intensifies their game of “chasing offers”. This can cause a problem for their current high school or club coaches. How fair is this ego to their teammates who are striving to attain their own goals? Does this leave the athlete not performing at an optimum level in fear of injury, in turn, leaving the team to suffer?

Jake New (2016) reported in his article, “Kim Simons Tortolani, the former head coach of Georgetown University’s women’s lacrosse team, said The accelerated recruiting timeline has far-reaching efforts: forcing early specialization in one sport, encouraging the growing practice of repeating an academic year in hopes of gaining an athletic advantage and promoting participation in club and travel teams at a younger age” (Ivy League announces proposals for curbing early recruitment of athletes, para. 9).          

 Student-athletes are not the only ones with inflated egos when it comes to early recruitment. Parents are also causing quite a disturbance in an area where we are already trying t train parents on appropriate behavior when around youth sports. In an article titled, “It’s Time for the NCAA to Stop the Early Recruiting Insanity”, there are examples of horror stories of parents attacking club coaches after their “division I” prospect child was placed on the B team instead of A- team. Coaches are being harassed and accused of cheating their child out of future opportunities. In one instance, it was a 9-year-old kicker! Regardless if this parent has older children who may have received offers at early ages, it doesn’t justify the unfair pressure being placed on an elementary-age child. Early recruitment is driving up the competition even among our elementary-age children. In essence, it is robbing our children of being children. They are being forced to focus solely on what college they will play for one day. This is the age where children should be trying multiple sports. It is when they should be learning the meaning of terms such as; work ethics, comradery, and sportsmanship. They should be learning the basics of the game, and how to be a good teammate. More importantly, they should be learning time management and how to balance their everyday responsibilities while playing sports recreationally.

There is no need to rush into making a commitment when you can use this valuable time to focus on your skills, your academics, and quite frankly continue to learn about various college programs. It’s in an athlete’s best interest to watch the direction of various college programs. Look to see if they have had any controversy. Research the safety of the school. Does the school have your academic program and if it does, what is its reputation or job placement statistics. What kind of support will they offer you as a learner? It is impossible to envision yourself as a college student when you don’t even know how well you will handle your high school level academics yet. Watch the college programs player and coaching turnovers. The bottom line is that the longer you wait, the more you will learn about the program. According to the NCAA, one-third of college athletes transfer to another program after the first year of school. We have to stop the insanity and not allow this to become the new norm.

New, Jake. 2016. Ivy League Announces Proposals for Curbing Early recruitment of Athletes.
Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved by https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/09/21/ivy-league-announces-proposals-curbing-early-recruitment-athletes

O’Sullivan, John. 2016. It’s Time for the NCAA to Stop the Early Recruiting Insanity. Retrieved 

by http://changingthegameproject.com/time-ncaa-stop-early-recruiting-insanity/